How does the science history explored by the podcast suggest that science is non-linear (e.g., it does not necessarily “progress”)?
Why were some early scientists interested in identifying races based on human attributes (e.g., characteristics of skulls)? Describe the scientific process they used to make these identifications.
What was the relevance of the scientific discovery in the year 2000 toward understanding the non-biological basis of race?
The podcast describes that the scientific process can be used to show that only certain races experience certain medical condition. Cite one example of such a medical condition and its respective race. How do the experts in the podcast alter the credibility of these findings?
What are two social factors (cited by the podcast) that perpetuate notions of race and/or racism in the United States today?
Re-read your assignment “You Relationship to Science I.” To what extent have the ideas explored in the podcast influenced your thoughts/perspectives on science and your relationship to science?
Finally, respond to one of the following three questions:

In what ways (cited by the podcast) can a critical examination of the role of race in science be productive towards the improvement of the scientific enterprise?
What are ways that you might be able to advocate for/enact change in the perpetuation of inaccurate science ideas about race? (start with your daily doings, your current relationships, or possible future engagements on campus or in your community [be specific, cite organizations, etc.])
What questions do you have about the influence of race on the field of astronomy?