Western history

  Western history is written from the perspective of conquering people who have a specific agenda: supporting a system of institutionalized oppression to maintain and gain more power and wealth. So how are Castillo and/or Silko's versions of minority women's lives more truthful and important to overall American culture and society? Defend your idea with reasons, examples, details, chains of logic, the primary texts, and academic secondary sources. Cite the latter two items appropriately in-text.