Why were the psychoanalytically-based explanations of autism, such as those of Bettelheim and Mahler, taken seriously in the 1950s and 1960s? Why have psychoanalytic/psychotherapeutic approaches to understanding autism (see, for example, Tustin, 1981/1995, 1991) continued to have a role in treating children and adults with ASD and supporting their families?
The psychoanalytically-based explanations of autism
Our Advantages
- ☑ Plagiarism free papers
- ☑ 24/7 support
- ☑ Cost friendly prices
- ☑ Money-back guarantee
- ☑ Unique and original content
- ☑ Total adherence to deadlines
- ☑ PowerPoint slides