The Porter and Heppelmann (2014) article

While there is certainly merit to the arguments made by Periglieri et al., there are also potential drawbacks that must be considered when implementing their proposed solutions. For example, increasing regulations and costs associated with managing gig economy employees could make it difficult for small businesses to remain competitive in the market. Additionally, increased regulation may lead some employers to avoid hiring gig economy workers altogether or limit their hours in order to reduce costs and risks associated with employee management. Therefore, while Gig Economy companies should certainly strive for fairness when it comes to how they manage their employees, policy makers should carefully consider all potential implications before taking action on Periglieri et al.'s proposals.

Sample Solution

The authors argue that gig economy companies such as Uber manage their employees in a manner that is inconsistent with traditional labor regulations, creating an environment of exploitation and insecurity for workers. Furthermore, the authors suggest that these digital platforms do not provide workers with fair wages, benefits or job security. They propose several solutions to address this issue, including enacting policies and regulations to protect workers and providing them with more equitable compensation.