A Blundering Generation or an Irreconcilable Conflict: The Origins of the Civil War
Prepare: In Chapter 9, you will find that histories of the origins of the Civil War can be roughly divided into two
camps: those who argue that the war was caused by a “blundering generation,” whose inept handling of
sectional divisions resulted in an unnecessary war; and those who argue that the war resulted from an
“irreconcilable conflict” between distinct and incompatible slave and free societies, which could not forever
remain under the same system of government.
Along with the textbook, please also draw evidence from three of the following documents:
Dred Scott Case: The Supreme Court Decision (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h2933t.html)
The Clay Compromise Measures (http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/speech-against-clayscompromise-measures/)
A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from
the Federal Union (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp)
Lincoln’s “House Divided” Speech (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h2934t.html)
The Seventh of March Speech (https://www.ushistory.org/documents/seventh_of_march.htm)
Reflect: As you consider the source material, please keep in mind that textbooks often depict the past as if
historians had firm, complete knowledge of everything meaningful that happened in history. In fact, however,
historians work from limited evidence, and based on that evidence, they develop rival, sometimes
contradictory, understandings about the past.
Write: As you analyze the major events of the 1850s, did the Civil War result from a blundering generation or
an irreconcilable conflict? In your argument, refer to the following developments (along with any others you
argue are pertinent):
The Compromise of 1850
The Kansas-Nebraska Act and its consequences
The Dred Scott decision
John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry
The election of Abraham Lincoln