In chapter 17, we read about how the mapping of the human genome in science has led to some questions about race and ancestry. Review the video interview with Prof. Alondra Nelson about her research on genetic testing. Alondra Nelson’s interview on genetic testing and race explains the difficulties individuals encounter when trying to navigate the costs and benefits of finding out who they are and where they are from. In your journal describe at least one way in which genetic testing is complicated for African Americans. Then reflect on how and in which ways the new research into genetics force us to reconsider the question of race as a social construct. Then consider Prof. Alondra’s discussion on the complexities of genetic testing in the African American community and think about how these complexities might apply, or not, to another ethic group. For instance, consider your own ethnic heritage and how you may or may not get accurate information from genetic testing. Would you suggest that there be warning labels on commercially available genetic tests?
https://util.wwnorton.com/jwplayer?type=video&msrc=/wwnorton.college.public/sociology/youmay_interviews/nelson-full.mp4&isrc=/wwnorton.college.public/sociology/youmay_interviews/nelson-full.jpg&csrc=/wwnorton.college.public/sociology/youmay_interviews/nelson-full.vtt. +600 words, include references citation format is APA
One way in which genetic testing is complicated for African Americans is due to the history of their ancestors. This can be seen in Prof. Alondra Nelson’s interview where she explains that African American ancestry is particularly complex, with many people having a mixture of African, European and Native American heritage, as well as the admixture from other sources due to historical events such as slavery or colonization. She notes that this complexity means that it can be difficult for individuals to trace their heritage accurately through genetic testing. Furthermore, because many African Americans have been subject to systemic racial discrimination throughout history and into present times, there are often considerable psychological and emotional implications associated with such tests.
The new research into genetics has forced us to reconsider our understanding of race as a social construct rather than a biological one; this goes against what was previously accepted by society at large and even medical practitioners. Although genetic differences among humans exist on some level (such as variations in eye color or hair texture), these do not necessarily correspond to traditional notions of ‘race’ used by societies today – meaning that genetics alone cannot determine someone’s ethnic identity or cultural belongingness (Nelson). This calls into question how useful genetic testing really is when it comes to uncovering information about an individual’s identity or ancestry; instead it might be better for them to look beyond the results provided by the test itself and think more critically about why they wish find out more about themselves in terms of ethnicity or race-related matters (Nelson).
Given these complications I would suggest warning labels should accompany commercially available tests so customers are aware potential inaccuracies that arise from their results; this could also include advice outlining what appropriate action they should take once receiving said data such as consulting medical professionals who specialize on specific topics related ancestry/ethnicity. Moreover I believe further research needs continued into better inform users regarding avenues explore beyond genomic mapping technology ei: using family records/oral histories narrative interviews etcetera order properly locate oneself within larger societal framework produce beneficial outcomes both now future contexts..