In regards to its public communications strategy during this period of time, it is clear that Michigan was attempting to appear responsive to criticism from both its citizens and outside organizations like The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In October 2015 for example then-Michigan Governor Rick Snyder declared a state of emergency in Genesee County due to high levels lead found in local drinking sources. He additionally sought federal aid for clean up efforts that same month as well. Moreover in January 2016 he created his own task force dedicated solely investigating causes behind lead contamination spanning back all way until June 2012 when problems began occurring – ensuring a thorough investigation into what went wrong could take place if need be while simultaneously communicating an effort towards transparency by his administration..

This approach combined with various updates given via press release over years following have allowed Michigan’s government come across as professional despite being heavily criticized over mishandling crisis initially; And while positive PR may have been able accomplish much PR wise – many felt like their actions did not match words they were giving publicly.. This became increasingly evident when we look at actual implementations put forth by government since onset crisis which had been slow going till recently: Bottled Water distribution programs weren’t available until March 2016 even though source responsible was known before October 2015 announcement meaning months had passed without anything tangible being done benefit victims affected by lead poisoning., Furthermore it wasn’t until late 2018 medical benefits were extended those diagnosed with having high levels mercury &/or lead their bloodstream which took too long considering how dangerous heavy metals can be – especially children developing bodies; These examples show lack urgency from state . More must & should have been done within initial stages investigate extent problem itself instead focusing on communication strategies only would’ve resulted better outcome times like these where efficient management critical avoid further damages potential casualties that could arise due prolonged exposure pollutants found Flint River system’s waters more broadly speaking nationwide attention garnered regarding situation .

Overall it seems that State of Michigan made strides improving overall response communications during Flint Water Crisis but still much work needed terms implementing actual policies help constituents affected most While positive image created through outreach initiatives may help some degree short term , real solutions require actually providing victims tools they need combat lasting negative consequences caused careless practices past administrations Only then can true justice served those who suffered detrimentally because someone else’s negligence .