The Cost of Capital is obviously sensitive to interest rates. Discuss the significance of the cost of debt, the cost of equity and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) when calculating a discount rate to be used in cash flow analysis.
Describe the differences between the Payback Period and NPV? Which would you use?
The Cost of Capital is obviously sensitive to interest rates.
Cost of Equity: The cost of equity reflects what investors expect to earn from their investments over time given their perceived risk level. Generally speaking, higher levels of risk lead to higher returns, meaning that investors may be willing to accept lower rates if they feel confident that their money will generate greater profits over time. This can also include stock options which offer incentives like dividends or share buybacks where investors are rewarded based on company performance instead of fixed amounts set at issuance date.
Weighted Average Cost Of Capital (WACC): The WACC combines the two previously mentioned costs (debt and equity) along with any taxes applicable into one figure representing what an investor might expect from investing in a particular venture or project before accounting for inflation-adjusted returns over time . The percentage used here depends heavily on each individual’s risk tolerance level and estimated growth prospects, so it's important to identify these details first before moving forward with any calculations related to cash flow analysis using discounted rates.. Furthermore, businesses should consider all relevant components like short-term vs long-term borrowings; taxation regimes; stock option terms among others while estimating their WACCs since these items influence expected returns significantly as well!
Payback Period v/s NPV : Payback period is basically considering how quickly you can recover your initial outlay through inflows generated by the project during its lifetime whereas NPV includes not only those inflows but also considers time value - i.e., money today has different worth than same amount received after some years due inflation etc... Thus NPV takes into consideration full life time recovery including revenues generated through sale proceeds & depreciation benefits against initial outlays made at start up + opportunity cost & inflation adjustment etc...So clearly NPV gives much better picture about financial viability / viability aspect post tax etc.. Whereas pay back method doesn't take all these factors into consideration & gives more emphasis towards quicker recovery & liquidity aspect rather than profitability aspect ! So in nutshell , I would prefer & suggest that everyone must use Net Present Value method while making decision related investment evaluation !