Watch the following:
Taken for a Ride, directed by Jim Klein (1996, New Day Films). (Available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/pI8GDklsN4 )
Modern Times, directed by Charles Chaplin (1936). (Available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/giJ0YMaAc8s )
Metropolis, directed by Fritz Lang (1927). (Available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/0mK46KprASM)
The advent of the Second Industrial Revolution did not succeed in minimizing the workplace dangers and
public health concerns that had become a hallmark of the First Industrial Revolution. In fact, the introduction of
increasingly toxic materials into the workplace environment and the greater public sphere served to exacerbate
those dangers and concerns. Naturally, critical concerns arose regarding the impact that these new
technological developments were exerting upon both daily life and societal development as a whole.
1. According to his essay on technological fundamentalism, why does Robert Jensen believe that technological
fundamentalism poses a greater societal threat than religious, national, or market fundamentalisms? How do
you imagine that Filippo Marinetti would respond to Jensen’s argument?
2. According to the film Taken for a Ride, why did the General Motors corporation systematically engage in
efforts to replace public rail transit with public bus and private auto transit? Why did General Motors endeavor
to keep their actions hidden from public view?
3. Based on the chapter by Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner, why did General Motors (and other industries
with which they were associated) maintain that tetraethyl gas posed no public health threat? Why did they
instigate legal actions against those who offered evidence of the public danger of tetraethyl gas?
4. Opinion question (no right or wrong answer): Were there any scenes from the films Modern Times or
Metropolis that reminded you of present-day society? That is to say, did you see any parallels between
present-day society and the societies depicted in these two films? If so, please provide examples.