1. How do the tactics related to group dynamics involve the managerial functions outlined by the P-O-L-C framework?
2. What are the distinctions among procedural, interactional, and distributive justice? List ways in which you could increase each of these justice perceptions. Citation format is MLA,+ 400 words
The tactics related to group dynamics involve several of the managerial functions outlined by the P-O-L-C (Planning, Organizing, Leading and Controlling) framework. Planning involves setting goals and objectives for a team or workgroup and developing a plan of action to meet them. In terms of group dynamics, this could include creating an open and collaborative environment for brainstorming ideas and goal-setting. Additionally, it could involve determining how tasks will be delegated amongst team members as well as establishing deadlines and other metrics to measure performance.
Leadership requires motivating individuals towards collective success through mentorship, delegation options, positive reinforcement, setting clear expectations etcetera; here too it is important to foster an open dialog among all participants where each opinion is valued so that everyone feels part of the process without feeling overwhelmed or undervalued due to their inexperience or lack thereof if any within said field/project/etcetera.
Finally controlling implies monitoring progress against established goals while providing feedback on results in order improve outcomes over time; this practice could also include periodic reviews with employees involved in order ensure they are not being overburdened nor are taking too long on assigned task -allowing them voice their concerns if necessary-.
Procedural justice refers to decisions made according to fair processes; those processes must be applied consistently across individuals regardless of power position within the organization (Becker&Huselid 1992). Ways in which procedural justice can be increased include implementing merit based reward systems such as promotions instead of making decisions based upon seniority alone; encouraging input from all involved parties when making decisions about job assignments; having clearly defined policies which apply equally throughout organization; offering employees more autonomy regarding daily activities as well offering more opportunities for training & development (Rousseau 1991) Interactional Justice deals with interpersonal interactions between supervisors & subordinates which should take into consideration both parties’ feelings & opinions while showing respect & understanding even if no agreement can be met ; ways increase interactional justice perceptions would involve giving constructive criticism rather than one sided negative feedback; actively listening & trying address any grievances presented using a respectful tone;; praising efforts whenever possible ,and ensuring there is recognition between supervisor & subordinate roles rather than create an atmosphere where only top executives have say(Dash et al 2018); Distributive Justice focuses on fairness outcomes such as compensation benefits working conditions etcetera doing so allows workers feel rewarded appropriately expected effort thus increasing motivation morale . As such methods increase distributive justice perception might include offering competitive salaries ; ensuring safe working conditions ; investing employee health welfare initiatives like gym membership discounts flexible schedules etceteras ; granting bonuses incentives when deserved etc.(Ambrose et al 2009).