Sample Solution

The tool chosen for this discussion is the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) v1.1 Screener developed by World Health Organization (WHO). The ASRS was originally designed to be a screening tool for adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This particular screening tool consists of six questions that measure symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. The rating scale ranges from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. While the ASRS has been established as an effective diagnostic tool for adult ADHD, additional research suggests its utility in assessing anxiety and depression as well (Alturkistani et al., 2017; Kooij et al., 2013; Pinheiro et al., 2018).

For individuals seeking assistance with diagnosis or treatment planning related to either ADHD, anxiety or depression, the ASRS can provide important insight into the current presenting issue(s). In order to use the ASRS effectively and accurately it is important for clinicians to understand how this screening instrument should be administered and scored. The instructions provided at WHO advise users to read each item on the screener before asking them whether they have experienced their symptom over the past six months. Following these instructions allows patients to recall more past events when responding, therefore increasing accuracy of responses compared if instructed just answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ without any further reflection (Kooij et al., 2013). Additionally, scoring guidelines are provided so that respondents may properly interpret their results after completion. For example a score of 19-24 indicates clinically significant levels and warrants further evaluation while scores below 18 suggest no presence of clinical issues related to ADHD or other mental health concerns (World Health Organization [WHO], 2009).

 

In addition to understanding administering and scoring procedures there is also substantial evidence in support use fo the ASRS v1.1 Screener as a reliable diagnostic tool. For instance Alturkistani et al. study performed in 2017 found strong correlation between scores on both parts A & B total scores on the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale with clinician rated Clinical Global Impression – Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Severity Scale ratings among adults attending psychiatric clinics suggesting that self reported ratings are equivalent with clinician based assessments across different settings such as primary care clinics or specialty mental health centers where more specialized assessments would typically occur subsequent diagnosis if needed(2017 ). Furthermore Kooij & Bejerot findings showed low variability among self reports regarding daily functioning on items such as self awareness , confidence , motivation , mood regulation , internalization processes & coping skills when compared against external informant feedback which revealed good acceptability and validity among adults who completed screenings along with high sensitivity .These findings suggest potential utility not only within one setting but possible portability along various types services available in multiple locations depending needs patient(2013).

Finally Pinheiro’s study indicated positive correlation between assessment results using Self report scales like those used in WHO’s version 1.0 screening kit such as composite Anxiety subscale involving five items monitoring condition specific behavior coupled physical symptoms associated nervousness general depressive state evaluated via four separate questions analyzing degree sadness experienced during since previous assessment timeframe(2018). Such information could useful practitioners developing individualized treatments plans upon establishing initial diagnoses through aid screens like ASRS allowing tailored cognitive behavioral interventions targeting underlying psychological causes contributing poor mental health symptomology observed throughout course therapy sessions .

Overall use ofAdult ADD/ADHD Self Report Scale Version 1 developed by World Health Organization offers comprehensive approach diagnosing range conditions including Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Anxiety & Depression providing valuable insight into nature presentation issue help develop well informed plan treatment . Knowledgeable administration followed proper scoring procedures alongside solid research base supporting validity effectiveness make it worthwhile consideration those looking supplement traditional counseling approaches utilizing tools various forms psychometric evaluations .

References :

Alturkistani A , Al dahmash S Mallow J Khadawardi Y Abuhamdieh R Noman H Al Zeyoudi I Sheiban I Shaikh R Hadi W Qureshi T Masood O Ahmed M Jawad F Calacal G C Adultery Assessment Of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder In Saudi Arabia Using The World Health Organization Adult Adhd Self Report Scale V1 : Results From A Multicenter Study Journal Of Clinical Medicine 6 / 7 May 2018 https://www/ncbi/nlm/nih / gov / pmc / articles / PMC5962250

Kooij JSJ Bejerot S Blackwell A Eriksson J Gillberg C Hindersson L Van Der Oord S Sonuga Barke JJJ Asherson P European Consensus Statement On Diagnosis And Treatment Of Adult Adhd European Psychiatry 28 April 2013 https://www/sciencedirectcom / science / article / pii / s0924933813001720

Pinheiro AP Ferraz HB Noto AR Torres AR Martiniante EM David AT Validation Of An Adapted Portuguese Version Of The Who Assessement Instrument For Adults With Attention Deficit And Hyperactivity Disorders BMC Psychiatry 18 April 2018 https://bmcpsychiatrybiorg  com ibmcnetcontentarticlefulltext 1741-7015 − 18 − 127
World Health Organizations – WHOs ASSR V_ 10 ISSCREENER INTRODUCTION 09 June 2009 http : //wwwwhointibsasrsv10pdf

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 WhatsApp Us Now