Rogerian model of argument

  "Construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or "middle ground." 1. Summary of Positions ❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1? ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1? ❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2? ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2? 2. Thesis/Claim ❒ Does you claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles? ❒ Does your claim present a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a "middle ground" between the two sides? 3. Analysis ❒ Have you backed up your claim using facts from both sides of the argument? ❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance? 4. Reflection ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection 1. How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences) 2. Will you use the Rogerian Approach in your own argumentative essay?