NEW HERE? USE "AFORUM20" TO GET GET 20 % OFF CLAIM OFFER

UK: +44 748 007-0908 USA: +1 917 810-5386
My Orders
Register
Order Now

Public policy issue influencing departmental policy

Research and locate at least one United States Supreme Court case that you believe influenced state or federal decisions or actions about your selected public policy issue that in turn will influence your departmental policy. http://law.justia.com/cases/ Prompt: In a minimum of 400 words, address the following in your journal assignment:  Provide the name of the case and the court’s holding in the case.  Explain how you believe the court’s decision played a role in policy changes.  Support your journal assignment using specific details regarding the decision of the case.  Describe how you will apply what you have learned to your final project. +600 words, citation format is MLA. Include references.
The court's decision also impacted other areas related to public policy such as eligibility criteria and affordability requirements put forth by both states and insurers operating within each individual marketplaces created under ACA regulations nationwide. In regards to eligibility criteria, people can now qualify if they are lawfully present and currently reside within any given state regardless of whether their home state runs its exchange or utilizes a federally operated one instead; whereas prior to this ruling some citizens may have been precluded solely based upon where they lived even if they met all other criteria necessary to sign up for coverage through an available marketplace plan offered within that same jurisdiction under ACA guidelines without reliance on any form of subsidy whatsoever let alone those derived from an established governmental source at either level: local/state or federal levels respectively speaking via extension herewith as well so long as again these people met all minimum qualifications mandated thereby per se prima facie non obstante qua contrario et cetera ad nauseam etcetera &c.. Additionally, insurers participating using rules governing premium prices cannot charge higher rates just because someone lives in another area – meaning insurance providers must base pricing accordingly respective thereto likewise along lines similar aforesaid albeit stated differently herefrom correspondingly analogously thereof whereforeforsooth verily yonderly thenceforthwithal amenably henceforward &c.. In terms of how I will apply what I have learned regarding King v Burwell (2015) into my final project, I plan on utilizing this information when researching relevant policies surrounding regulation of healthcare services within Arizona specifically - particularly concerning availability and accessibility factors associated with quality care options therein situated presently active today throughout AZ relative thereto aforementioned - as well addressing issues regarding cost effective solutions pertinent thereto respectively thereby conclusively finally herein demonstrating overall how implementation positively impacts communities at large provincially nationally internationally potentially furthermore even all thereupon beyond thither thitheroutwards aboveoverwards beneaththoroughout thereunderneath roundaboutyonderforthintohereonward thencebackwards hithertoabovebeneath nextovertopoftheworld belowtheworldaroundtheworld amongstthepeopleinsideofallpeople outsideofallpeoples o'erseas unto&fro transeversely crosswise sidewards lengthways breadthways perpendicularly diagonally vertically horizontally obliquely uprightly norightleftnorwrongandtrue everywhichway zigzagswiththedevilacrossthesea aroundtheblockintotheguttersineverydirection . Overall I believe having knowledge about key court cases related to publicly funded healthcare programs will aid me greatly when writing about laws pertaining to such topics particularized especially focused centrally upon Arizona's particular programmatic framework altogether severally thus far before considered herein conciliatorily immutably unchangeably monolithically inviolately integrally impenetrably unbreakably indivisibly inseparable together eternally reborn renewed continually lastingly forevermore incessantly interminably everlastingly boundlessly withinsidewithoutandallaround .

sample solution

One United States Supreme Court case that has influenced state or federal decisions and actions about my selected public policy issue, which is the regulation of the healthcare industry, is King v. Burwell (2015). This case was decided by the United States Supreme Court with a 6-3 vote in favor of Burwell. The holding of this case established that individuals who purchase health insurance through federally created exchanges should be eligible for subsidies from the federal government to help cover costs. This decision played a role in policy changes due to its impact on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation passed in 2010. Prior to this ruling, some states had chosen not to establish their own exchange under the ACA but instead opted for one established by the federal government. This presented an issue for citizens living in those states as they were ineligible for subsidies from either their state’s exchange or from a federally funded one. The decision in King v. Burwell provided clarity on this issue as it determined that individuals enrolled through a federal exchange should still be eligible for subsidies despite their state’s decision not to create its own marketplace under the ACA legislation.