Prisoner lawsuits
A frequent criticism of prisoner lawsuits is that they are frivolous (not having any serious purpose or value). Cite examples from this chapter that either support or dispute this claim.
Disputing:
-In the case of Ruiz v. Estelle, inmates successfully sued Texas prison officials on grounds that they had been subjected to unconstitutional conditions and overcrowding in their cells. This ruling set a precedent for other prisons to improve their treatment of prisoners and strengthened judicial oversight over correctional facilities nationwide—hardly considered frivolous matters by any standard.
-In Rhodes v. Chapman, prisoners successfully argued that Ohio's practice of double bunking within cramped cells violated their 8th Amendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment—a serious matter rather than frivolous one.