For this assignment, consider the following scenario:
You are the vice president for facilities and planning at a large community college. The supervisor for building
and grounds at the college calls Friday afternoon at 2:00 to report that one of the college custodians, Steve
Culp, has returned from his lunch an hour late and is sitting on an overturned bucket, refusing the direction of
his supervisor to return to work. The supervisor says Culp smells of alcohol and is acting drunk.
The supervisor tells you that while Culp has been sitting on the bucket refusing to work or move, the supervisor
has searched the custodian’s locker provided by the college. In the pocket of Culp’s jacket, which the college
provides as part of the custodian’s regulation uniform, the supervisor reports finding crack cocaine.
The supervisor indicates that, according to his medical file, the custodian has been hospitalized for inpatient
chemical dependency within the last two years utilizing the college’s health insurance. The custodian’s
personnel file, which is kept in the human resources office separate from the medical information, contains a
Last Chance Agreement dated one year ago, whereby the custodian agreed to termination if found under the
influence of alcohol on the job.
Answer the following questions. Type each question and include your answer after each question.
What HR issues do you identify in this scenario?
Does the college have any rights or obligations in this case? Explain.
Cite support for your opinion from this unit’s articles and O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987), including
the page number in the case. After the first full citation of the case in your paper, you can simply say, O’Connor
at (page number). Review the tab “How to Cite a Case” from the media presentation (linked in Resources).
Note that Ortega did not win his case. Consider the majority opinion, which rules.
Is Culp entitled to the same rights that Dr. Ortega tried to argue (but lost) on in O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S.
709 (1987)? Why or why not? Cite support for your opinion from the case.
Does Culp have any justifiable right to privacy regarding his employer-provided jacket pocket? Explain. Cite
support for your opinion from O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987).
Do the rights and obligations of the university outweigh Culp’s? Explain. Cite support for your opinion from the
Unit 4 articles and O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987).
Would it matter if the supervisor found a bottle of beer in the jacket pocket instead of crack cocaine?
Can the vice president and supervisor review information in the medical record and the personnel file, both of
which are kept separately in the HR office, since they are the key personnel involved in the possible discipline
of Culp? Explain.
Based on all of your information and analysis, will you terminate the custodian or not?
This case has many factors for you to consider before rendering a management decision. Be sure to include:
An evaluation of the applicability of federal statutes and best practices regarding privacy and the obligation of
the employer to provide a safe workplace.
An analysis as to whose interests (the university or the employee’s privacy) are paramount in light of the law.
List your sources within the text of your answers and at the end of your paper in current APA style and format.
Refer to the How to Cite and Brief a Case media (linked in Resources) if necessary.
Sample Solution
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>