Part I: Identifying Illegal and Unethical Application Questions (20 points)
Using the applications provided by the instructor (posted below this assignment and with chapter 6 material) find 20 illegal or unethical questions. Each answer is worth 1 point for a total of 20 points. You need to provide APA in-text citations to indicate where your information came from. Write these up on a word document following the format provided below. Failure to follow said format will result in a point deduction for the question or zero credit. You should have a “Reference” page in APA format to indicate where your answers came from. Please number your answers. Each question should contain one or two citations and rationales should be three sentences long.
Part II: Writing Interview Questions (10 points)
In this section you will write the interview questions you will ask during potential candidate interviews. These questions should assess an individual’s fit with an organization and for the position (based on the job statement, job duties/essential functions, and job specifications). These questions should also allow you to juxtapose candidates to ascertain who the most qualified candidate is.
Keep in mind the legal parameters related to interview questions, essential job functions, and the competencies you are trying to assess. What questions will assess the capabilities of the person you are interviewing, as well as the motivation to perform at a high level if given the position. Do not ask any questions that could land you in court!! Create at least 10 questions to assess the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Personality of the job candidates. There should be at least two situational interview questions and two behavioral description interview questions. You may not copy these off the internet. You must create them yourself.
To accurately write interview questions you need to look at a few job descriptions as well as O*Net to understand the position you may have to hire for. By actually having a job description including; job title, job identification/job statement, job duties/job essential functions, and job specifications you will ask better questions. (You definitely should use O*Net as one of your sources for the information.)
Tell me the position and organization you are writing the interview questions for. Then write 10 interview questions. Number your interview question one 1 through 10.
Position: Women’s Soccer Coach
Organization: University of North Carolina at Pembroke
1) Situational Interview Question – Two of your star players are constantly arguing on the field during the game. What would be your short-term and long-term solutions for addressing this issue?
Important assignment parameters and reminders…
Avoid conjecture!! Provide support for your answers and indicate where you gathered supporting evidence for your suppositions in Part I. Your similarity match must be below 30% on the plagiarism detection software which means you may not just cut and paste answer for your entire paper. Some direct quotes are acceptable, but use in-text citations to reference facts you learned in an article but wrote in your own words. Papers must be posted to canvas before assignment will be graded. No late assignments are accepted without documentation of FMLA.
You must follow the “writing guidelines” posted on Canvas.
All answers should include in-text citations consistent with APA formatting style guidelines. If your paper contains plagiarized material you will receive a zero. Additionally, one point will be deducted for each APA formatting error so please review guidelines carefully.
You may use your textbook to answer questions. In addition, use the library database system to find peer-reviewed journal articles to find support for your suppositions. See directions in folder under Written Applied Assignments Module.
No websites may be used except EEOC, SHRM, and O*Net.
Answers must be in complete sentences. One point will be deducted for each incomplete sentence.
Paper Format and Directions
If the question is always illegal you need to reference 1) which application the question came from, 2) indicate the question is illegal, and 3) write out the illegal question exactly as written in application as well as 4) rationale for why the question is illegal (what law/legislation is this question breaking).
Application: Illegal, Unethical, or Potentially Illegal – “Question from application written exactly as written on application.”
Rationale – You need to provide a rationale as to why this application question is illegal, unethical, or potentially illegal. Each answer should be at least three sentences long and provide at least one or two in-text citations in proper APA format.
1) Duck Man Donuts (list application first): Illegal question – “Are you a diabetic or has anyone in your family ever been diagnosed with sugar mania?”
Rationale – According to the EEOC (2019) organizations should not ask questions about an applicant’s….. continue with rationale(s). (Answer must be two or three sentences long.)
If the question is unethical or potentially illegal you need to 1) identify application, 2) indicate the question is potentially illegal or unethical, 3) write out question exactly as written in application, and 4) “why” in this instance the question should not be asked, as well as 5) what question could be asked if any.
2) Arby’s: Potentially Illegal and Unethical Question – “Do you have reliable transportation to work?”
Rationale – Driving a personal vehicle or company vehicle is not an essential job function. This could create an adverse impact based on the American’s with Disability Act (citation) as someone may not be able to drive but could still work as a cook or cashier. (Answer must be two or three sentences long plus a separate sentence for how the application question should be written to make it ethical and avoid breaking any laws.)
They should ask: The organization is probably trying to make sure an employee will not miss shifts and will arrive to work on time. As such, they should ask, “Are you able to arrive at work on-time?” instead.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>