Prepare a 4-6 page analytical paper selecting a contemporary figure, celebrity, story, film, music video, television program, novel, etc., and make an argument that this figure IS or IS NOT feminist or empowering for women… ***Objectives for this paper are to ?Choose a perspective on feminism from the competing arguments presented in class?Apply course concepts to pop culture that is relevant in your media world?Make an argument on a controversial topic using evidence and textual support*** The introductory paragraph should contain a CLEAR THESIS STATEMENT which names your chosen text and chooses one position which a brief indication of why. For example: In this paper, I argue that Fergie is a feminist icon because her videos can be read as both Stripper Chic and Camp, which celebrates women’s sexual power, deconstructs stable gender qualities, and demonstrates agency and control over her world. -or- Fergie is definitely not a feminist icon or empowering for women because her videos reinforce a narrow focus on women’s bodies, sexuality-based entirely on performing for heterosexual men and not based on female desire, and she uses white privilege and racist framing.?Even if you are ambivalent, you need to argue one side or the other. For the sake of this exercise, you need to argue that the figure either IS feminist or IS NOT feminist, and not argue that there is a little of both. Most popular culture is ambiguous at best, but in order to develop a clear argument, choose a side. ?The paper should contain a detailed explanation (1-2 paragraphs) of what version(s) of 3rd wave feminism you are using to make your assessment of “feminist” or “not feminist. It is not sufficient to quote the dictionary that says “Feminism means equality for women.” Rather, you need to stake a position based on one of the key ideas we have read or discussed in class. To do so, cite, quote, paraphrase, and/or explain one or more of our course readings. You do not need to use any outside sources to describe your position on feminism beyond our course readings, but you may use outside sources if you tie them into the key ideas from our class. These paragraphs will establish the grounds for your argument that a key text is or is not feminist. For Example: By Stripper chic, I am referring to Clark Mane’s notion of “gaze empowerment” which suggests…Gill argues that hyper-sexualized ideologies masquerade as a feminist choice, and thus… By camp, I use the definition by Shugart and Waggoner…?Your paper should focus on a specific piece of pop culture or a single pop cultural figure as opposed to a general phenomenon. I.e. A video by Beyonce, Katniss Everdeen in the final film of the Hunger Games, the plot of 50 Shades of Gray, The Bachelor, Lara Croft videogame, etc.. You may choose any figure or pop culture event that is relevant to the question of contemporary feminism. Ask me if you are uncertain.? Your paper should not only describe your chosen case but needs to use detailed and specific evidence from your text to support your claims. For instance, if you choose to study a figure such as “Kylie” you need to provide quotes either from her Instagram, commercials, tv show appearances, interviews etc. ?For example:Fergie represents “gaze empowerment” because she demonstrates that she is in control of the encounter. In the song “My Humps,” she claims “You can look but you can’t touch. If you touch it’ll start some drama, and you don’t want no drama. No, no drama. No No No No drama, so don’t pull on my hand, boy…” What this quote demonstrates is that even as she is being visually sexy in public, Fergie warns that she is not available for sexual encounters with all suitors. She will choose who and when she will be touched by men. This supports Shugart And Waggoner’s claim that….” ?A well-organized paper will develop three main points where you detail three different examples of the same claim or three variations of the claim.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>