Compare the efficacy of the COVID-19 public health and socioeconomic in Mexico to U.S.A citation format is APA, +1200 words.
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has spread rapidly across the world and had an immense impact on public health and the economy. In Mexico and the United States, both countries have implemented policies to protect their citizens from the virus, but how effective are these measures in comparison? To determine effectiveness of COVID-19 public health and socioeconomic responses for both countries, this paper will look at a variety of factors including testing rates, death tolls, quarantine policies, unemployment rate increases and economic stimulus packages.
Death Toll Comparison
Due to inadequate testing capacity mentioned earlier it is not surprising that Mexico also lags behind other nations when looking at their death toll related statistics too. As reported by BBC News (2021) ,Mexico had recorded 437 deaths per million inhabitants as opposed 590 deaths/million inhabitants experienced in US – a disparity which can partially be attributed differences between respective healthcare systems employed each country (BBC News 2021). Moreover findings show that younger age groups are more likely infected in both cases however mortality levels tend remain higher amongst elderly individuals within USA due better equipped hospitals providing adequate medical treatment needed help those sufferers stay alive during crisis period compared lower standards found most Mexican medical facilities(Rodrigues et al.,2020 ) .This can again be seen reflection unequal distribution resources support each nation’ s population particularly since poorer members society are more vulnerable catching serious illnesses like coronavirus thus highlighting need increased assistance targeted appropriate areas order truly tackle problem facing whole population rather relying on blanket approach adopted many socioeconomically developed countries instead .
Quarantine Policy Comparison
The two countries have taken different approaches when it comes to quarantining citizens during the pandemic. In March 2020, Meixco declared nationwide shutdown along with daily curfews lasting till May 2nd aiming reduce contact between citizens minimize chances community based transmission occurring(Whellan & Armendariz Hernandez ,2021 ). However after initial stage this plan was replaced 10 individual state specific strategies called “Stay Home Protocol”which mirrored guidelines set forth national government yet allowed governors freedom decide best course action depending situation play out locally area time without directly contradicting central administration decisions(Whellan & Armendariz Hernandez ,2021 ) . On contrary US took much more stringent stance adopting lockdown policy almost entire nation decreeing mandatory stay home orders issued majority states order combat rising infection rates throughout land addition large proportion businesses forced closed until further notice aid enforcement process general public safety concern come first American authorities understandings circumstances surrounding pandemic developments taking place globally present day (Rosenheck & Kestenbaum ,2020 ). Unfortunately experience shows both strategies ultimately yielded same results terms total number infections reported despite obvious discrepancies implementation plans themselves proving therein lies lesson future should similar scenarios arise none approaches necessarily superior over any another context dependant upon given situation decision makers must take into account before moving forward anything else
Unemployment Rate Increases Comparison
Both countries have seen substantial increases unemployment rates result efforts slow down spread disease though numbers achieved through different means primarily nature jobs being furloughed or lost goes indicate degree severity regarding effects past year’s events taken overall societies no doubt great deal hardship witnessed numerous families worldwide consequence struggle maintain income level pre COVID era conditions existent today date anyway but main point here comparative analysis required find similarities contrast existing gaps USA appears handle issue slightly better regard matter currently registered 6 7 % however figure stands 10 4 % mexico making stark contrast already precarious social economic position south american neighbour north facts speak themselves therefore solutions must tailored meet needs suit current realities each case prevent worst possible outcomes arising particular situation itself long run
Economic Stimulus Packages Comparison
As last major topic discussion papers focus turn towards subject economic stimulus packages deployed each country attempt mitigate damage inflicted coinciding global crisis fact remains America enjoyed certain advantages materialize theirs prior Mexican equivalent namely size budget combined timely authorization enable faster rollout beneficial measures benefit greater portion population much faster speed than rival counterpart does mean end result identical far reaching potential concerned though arguably richer country certainly able move quicker deliver larger scale projects payouts intended recipients hard truth comes down real cost lesser amounts allotted resulting poorer returns expected return investment least amount money spent system ultimately doomed fail get job done proper manner since necessary funds just aren enough make difference felt anyone involved said activities disproving old saying “you get what you paid” applies full effect instances comparable nature either way end all discussions essence importance providing sufficient funds governmental programs requires attention detail utmost importance guarantee successful outcome operationally speaking least require satisfactory performance metrics observed continuously monitored smaller economies like ones found Americas generally relatively tight budgets allocated covering expenses incurred having cope disadvantages extent might possible provide assistance wherever applicable possibly alleviate burden faced thousands households across continent diminishing somewhat despondency encountered surrounding topics discussed today although small step right direction carries huge implications long term prospects prosperity region recently went through extensive period turbulence hope effort provide new normal soon allow return sense confidence sense security associated good times bad alike generations come go
Conclusion
Overall, when comparing public health and socioeconomic response capabilities for both countries there are clear distinctions between them: The United States had a higher capacity for Covid-19 testing whereas Mexico lacked behind significantly due resource issues; Death toll numbers were lower in US because better equipping hospitals which enabled adequate medical treatments aiding high risk patients remain alive during emergency period ; Quarantine strategies differ greatly between nations since American government implemented widespread lockdowns while Mexicans opted decentralized approach allowing state governors room maneuver depending situation their own region ; Unemployment figures indicated steady rise respective workforce populations meaning neither side made gains ground containing issue head up likewise economically stimulus packages presented equally unbalanced picture sides favor coming owing vastly disproportionate financial clout held superpower against South American nation requiring international cooperation remedy once current global conditions return back normalcy viable again post pandemic world dawning horizon carry suffering everywhere wealth poverty divide still exists work continue no matter what happens next future uncertain regardless prepare ourselves helps calm storms bring life earth humanity surface again whatever comes may we survive learn grow stronger together face challenges ahead courage strength kindness hearts united common purpose