Using your previously submitted outline as a guide, you will write a diagnostic
evaluation report of the same fictional character from your outline (who must be from a well-known movie,
book, or television program that has a diagnosis covered in the class). IMAGINE THAT THE CHARACTER
HAS LEFT THE MOVIE/BOOK/SHOW AND WALKED INTO YOUR CLINICAL OFFICE. HOW WOULD
HE/SHE RESPOND TO YOUR QUESTIONS? Please write the final report in narrative format, using complete
sentences, NOT bullet points. The outline is below; please label each section of the paper as the outline
suggests and address all of the information in the outline. The paper must conform to APA standards in terms
of citations, references, and formatting (though no abstract is needed). Papers should be 4-6 pages. It is up to
you to choose a case with enough complexity to fulfill the length requirement. All citations must be fully
referenced. Do not reference what you did not cite. Please refer to the current edition of the American
Psychological Association Publication Manual for further information on APA citations.
There is a lot of information on the internet to help you choose a case, for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_featuring_mental_disorders (Links to an external site.)
Paper Submission Guidelines: Papers must be submitted in Microsoft Word or text entry format through
Canvas. Papers that appear to be plagiarized may be submitted by instructor through Turnitin, which will
assign a similarity score to the outline if the content is too similar to published documents or other student
papers. You will lose 1 percentage point from your grade on the paper for every 1 percentage point beyond
10%. Papers with similarity scores that exceed 30% will not be awarded any points and a phone meeting with
the instructor will be required. If your papers similarity score is beyond 20% you are advised to contact the
instructor to discuss strategies to reduce this score in the future. Plagiarism or other forms of academic
dishonesty will not be tolerated and will result in at least an automatic “F” for the assignment (also see FSU
regulations).
Diagnostic Evaluation Guidelines
Please follow the outline format very closely on your final paper.
Please use the major headings in your paper, and try to address all of the components for each section.
If you do not have the information in question, you can state that you are not aware of the client’s current status
regarding that area (though you should not have to write that very often).
If the book, movie, or TV show does not provide you with much information about your character, it may be
wise to select a character from another source that provides more detail.
It is also permissible to take some creative license and fill in the blanks if you feel it will bring your character to
life.
For this reason, I ask that you only choose fictional (not real) characters. Please do not choose a
book/show/movie that portrays the life of a real person, alive or deceased.
While it is helpful to report some information about the client’s family and friends, please avoid the mistake of
over-analyzing a family member. Keep the focus on the client.
I DO NOT need a plot summary. Only share what is relevant to the client’s diagnosis and DO NOT start
detailing what happened in the movie. I should feel like I am reading about a real person that you met, not
about a movie or show.
Please follow APA format. Cite sources. Provide a references page. Double space. Etc.
I will be looking to see that you incorporated feedback from the outline on your final paper
Please use the following your outline to write your paper. Maintain the headings and order of information but
change your bullet points into a narrative format.
Demographic Information:
Age
Sex
Race/Ethnicity
Culture
Religion
Marital/Relationship status
Any other pertinent information, but keep this section somewhat short and to-the-point. You will elaborate later.
Current Problems/Presenting Problems:
Provide a thorough account of the reason client came to see you and/or was brought to you by friends/family.
Detail will help here (but do not do a plot summary).
Problematic symptoms
Frequency of symptoms (how often do they occur?)
Duration of symptoms (how long have they been present?
Severity of symptoms (how serious are they?)
Symptom triggers (do certain events or situations seem to trigger the symptoms
Social and Occupational History:
Information on family of origin including ethnic/cultural information – where did client grow up? Who did client
live with? Were parents married/separated/estranged? Any siblings? Strong ties with Grandparents? Etc.
General information on childhood
Traumatic events
History of abuse
Notable events
Occupational history
Current employment
Past employment
Employment struggles/successes
Educational history
Highest level of education achieved
Educational struggles/successes
Current family constellation
General information on spouse/partner (remember to focus on your client’s symptoms, you are only diagnosing
one person; report whatever you think may be impacting your client)
General information on children and close family members
Is client satisfied with current family situation?
Psychiatric History
Provide history of mental health diagnoses prior to when you met the client as well as any treatment received
Include a family history of psychiatric conditions in this section (if no history state that there is no family history
Medical History
Note all medical conditions the client has (these are conditions that are not psychiatric in nature, such as
diabetes)
Especially for conditions that might impact mental functioning, provide details about treatment, prognosis, etc.
For example, is the client managing their diabetes well?
Diagnostic Summary
First, summarize the information you obtained in your report in 1-2 paragraphs (hint: focus on what most
directly connects to your diagnosis
Explain each diagnosis you made and why
Specifically list which criteria from the DSM the client meets
Explain any other diagnoses you considered and explain why you ultimately ruled them out
Provide a brief prognosis – is this treatable? Will the client have a good quality of life?
Provide a brief treatment plan
What type of therapy would be beneficial?
Would you refer this client to a psychiatrist for medication?
Does this client need to be hospitalized immediately?
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>