Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 WhatsApp Us Now
Think about your current or a previous job, or a job you know well. Imagine that the HR department was going to design a compensation approach for that job that was aligned with reinforcement, expectancy, and agency theories.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 400 words:
Briefly describe the job.
Describe a compensation approach for that job that aligns with all 3 theories. Consider the following questions when writing your response:
What are the potential advantages of this plan?
What are the potential negatives of this plan?
What might be difficult in administering this plan?
The job I will be describing is a software engineer at a large software company. Software engineers are responsible for developing and maintaining software applications, documenting their code, performing testing to identify any bugs or errors in the program, and providing technical assistance to other members of the team.
A compensation approach that aligns with reinforcement, expectancy and agency theories would incentivize performance through rewards and recognition for desired behaviors. The plan would include both short-term rewards (e.g., cash bonuses) as well as long-term incentives (e.g., stock options). In order to ensure alignment with all three theories, the reward system should be focused on meeting goals that are specific, measurable and achievable; this will give employees an expectation of receiving positive results from their efforts (expectancy theory), while also providing tangible rewards for reaching those goals (reinforcement theory). Additionally, it provides a sense of autonomy by allowing the employee to pursue their own path towards success within certain parameters (agency theory).
The potential advantages of this plan are numerous – it increases motivation by giving employees clear goals to strive towards; it encourages collaboration among team members since they have something tangible they can work together on; it helps build loyalty among top performers since they receive additional recognition; finally, it gives management greater visibility into individual performance so they can better assess areas where improvement is needed.
At the same time, there are some potential negatives associated with this compensation approach – such as creating an overemphasis on money as the primary motivator which could lead to unethical behavior or even sabotage in order to reach goals faster; or creating competition between team members rather than encouraging collaboration – hence why setting clear expectations about acceptable behavior is crucial when implementing any type of incentive system. Additionally administering such a plan may also be difficult due to its complexity which requires careful planning from HR personnel regarding how each incentive structure should operate as well as monitoring ongoing performance levels over time. Finally there needs to be consideration taken on how often incentives need adjusting so that employees do not become complacent or bored too quickly with them – otherwise you risk losing out on potentially great talent who don’t find your company attractive enough anymore because of your lacklustre reward systems!