Consult for Fortune Globule 500

Despite these advantages however, one major drawback lies within potential bias on behalf of the researcher due human subject limitations such as small sample sizes or limited response rates (Ruggiero & Jones, 2018). The possibility of influencing results based on personal perspective or interpretation also exists which can affect validity within results obtained (Raichle et al., 2017). Other drawbacks include difficulty replicating findings across different contexts due inability to control environmental influences on outcomes; difficulties coding open-ended responses; potential threat posed by powerful stakeholders who may influence conclusions reached; cost effectiveness; time constraints often placed upon completion; logistics issues if remote data collections occur such as managing lost records or providing clear instructions among others (Raichle et al., 2017). Strategies For Building Trustworthiness Given these weaknesses it therefore becomes important that trustworthiness within a study’s design be built into your proposal when presenting it before executives like CEOs. Two strategies that can help maintain credibility include expert panel review along with field testing procedures used throughout data collection. Expert panel review involves collecting input from peers or experts in relevant fields—such as social workers–on topics proposed throughout each phase including design development through analysis stages(Lloyd-Oliver et al., 2021) . Field testing involves multiple trial runs prior implementation whereby questions included in surveys/interviews are reviewed so adjustments can be made prior implementation which ensures accuracy between intended meaning behind questions versus those actually asked during actual execution process(Sawyer & Williams , 2015 ). Additionally having protocols established ahead of time regarding handling outliers found during analyses helps ensure rigor especially given smaller sample sizes need –a common limitation encountered among most sequential exploratory designs(Bermann et al., 2019 ). Conclusion In conclusion there are many strengths inherent within conducting qualitative research such as its ability uncover details otherwise ignored under more traditional quantitative methodologies while building rapport between researchers and participant groups alike. Despite these advantages several weaknesses exist such as potential bias present due individual perspectives among other things thus making legitimacy dependant upon certain safeguards being put into place ahead before going forward with any plans proposed .Two effective methods discussed here would involve incorporating expert panel reviews along side field testing throughout all phases leading up until final analysis whereby outliers found could then be handled accordingly depending upon protocols set beforehand thereby enhancing overall reliability/validity should project move forward per initial request made by client company’s CEO..