Explain the differences between the three views of culture (parochialism, ethnocentrism, and pluralism). +1500 words, include references citation format is APA
Comparing the three views of culture
Ethnocentrism is closely related yet distinct from parochialism in important ways. According to The SAGE Encyclopedia of Anthropology (2018), ethnocentrism is “the belief in the fundamental superiority of one’s own ethnic group or culture over others” (Vitebsky & Giller 2004). Ethnocentrists evaluate cultural behavior based on their own standards rather than those held by members of other ethnic groups. Thus it leads individuals down a path where they believe that their values are better than those belonging to other societies or even those within their own group who adhere differently than what is considered the norm for them personally. Unlike parochialists who may simply avoid contact with foreign customs altogether; ethnocentric people often actively discredit outside influences as inferior while promoting only what conforms to their individual values system . Additionally since this attitude implies judgement it can lead others feel oppressed if they do not meet its standards thereby creating serious tension between societies and potentially resulting in hostility between ethnic groups over time if left unchecked.
Pluralistic attitudes represent an opposite approach comparedto parochialistm and ethnocentrism which seekswto embrace cultural differences ratherthan discriminate against them(Bagchi et al., 2018). Pluralists integrate diversity into everyday lifeby actively exploringand valuingothercultureswhilerecognizingtheir own biasesandprejudices(Hall & Hall,.2019). Ratherthan making judgementsaboutwhatis betteror worsebasedonone'sownviewpointpluraliststimeto learnfromotherpeoplesperspectiveswhichleads toelevatethemalltogetherthroughmutuallybeneficialoutcomeswhilealsofosteringgreaterrespectamonggroups internationallevelstooasit encouragespeopletotakeaninterestintheirneighborsregardlessofbackgroundororiginsforthebettermentoftheworldasawhole(Seiter&Weingroff2010).ThisapproachencouragesopencommunicationbetweencommunitieswhereconsensualunderstandingisexpectedratherthantolerationsomethingthatparoichalitsmandethnocerssimplycannotacceptortolearntheycanbothcoexistinpeaceandharmonyastherearesufficientllacksofdifferencesbetweenthemtoallowdiversitytoprevailoverdisciminationandyetstillretainenoughsimilaritiessotoensurethatcompatibilityisachievableonthelongrunbecomingmoreimportantnowadaysasdepictedinrecenteventssuchashowcountriesareworkingtogetherotrespontotheCoronaviruuspandemielettinggoofseveralnationaldifferencestopursuemoreglobalconcernssuchassavinglivesornpromoting moreequalitariangoalsaroundtheworldwhenitcomestomanagingcertainissuesastheresimplenomoretimetofocusonshallowdifferencesifhumanityisalreadyintoahigherriskofthesamemealstreryoneseemsbeheadedbutthisdoesnotmeanthatculturesshouldbedilutedbyacommonsettriewithoutharmonyinsteadthemutualrespectmustbepreservedbetweneverydaylifesothereisanunderstandingofwhattheothergroupfeelsneedsorsupportsalonethussustainingculturalintegrityforabetterfuturewithmanyvoicesheardandsupportedinsteadjustasingleonepredominant outlook
In conclusion then ,parochondralibrm representsa closedmindeedprespective based on prejudieec wicdh lacks awarenessofthedifferences amongstgroups< ethnocemtricum seeks too impose ones ove viesws onto otthers without regard otfnespectiog ther infividuality culd slespiritwil e whilst plulalimsm strives towards understanding hoeewver unique the perspectivbe nay be ra tehr than imposing any pre conceived judgements upon another