Comprehensive assessment should include multiple types of data such as physical exams that assess general health concerns as well psychological assessments including interviews with both patient and family members if applicable (Geller et al., 2003). During this process questions about past medical history should be asked in order to identify any risk factors that could contribute towards an accurate diagnosis such as whether there is any familial history of psychiatric illness or drug abuse (Geller et al., 2003). By assessing both the physical health along with psychological components it provides greater insight into determining which condition best suits a particular case based on its unique set criteria for each disease. For instance asking about sleep disturbances such as insomnia can help distinguish between Cyclothymic Disorder from Bipolar II since people who suffer from Cyclothymic Disorder typically do not have significant changes in sleeping patterns while people suffering from Bipolar 2 often report sleeping too much during times when they feel depressed or too little when feeling “high” (Geller et al., 2003). Further questions related lifestyle choices like alcohol consumption can also be used differentiating Cyclothymic Disorder which does not display signs associated with abusing substances while Bipolar 2 sufferers may use drugs/alcohol excessively during manic episode(s) (). Finally evaluating social functioning can provide further information since those suffering from Cyclothymic Disorder usually still maintain relationships while someone diagnosed soley with Bipolar 2 would likely struggle due stress created by uncontrollable emotional swings(Geller et al., 2003).

Comparing clinical criteria for both disorders allows clinicians to differentiate between them based upon severity levels for each symptom presented by patient . Allowing detailed evaluation ensures accurate diagnosis rather than confusion over which one better describes situation.. This is important because incorrect labeling poses potential problems concerning treatment options available .For example , someone diagnosed wrongly might only receive cognitive therapy instead proper pharmacological intervention necessary managing severe cases . Furthermore , comprehensive assessment also leads increased understanding regarding underlying cause affected individual´s behavior allowing development effective intervention plans reduce likelihood relapses occurring future .

In conclusion , comprehensive assessment plays key role diagnosing correctly between Cyclothyme Disorders versus Bipolar Ii by flagging relevant indicators through physical examinations interviewing techniques.. Additionally , it helps build profile directing practitioners towards personalized treatments improve long-term outcomes enhance quality life patients seeking assistance managing this type mental illness.

References:
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders 5th Edition – DSM-5™ Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Incorporation Geller BA, Tillman R & Bolhofner K (2003) Child And AdolescentBipolar Disorder: A Review Of The Past 10 Years J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42: 868–876