Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 WhatsApp Us Now
Describe one of the following five ways to assess validity of a research instrument (Face validity, convergent validity, concurrent validity, predictive validity, or construct validity) in your own words (see image below). How would you assess for this type of instrument validity in a published research study? Include references, citation format is MLA, +800 words
Face validity is a type of instrument validity that measures how appropriate and relevant the research questions are to the research study’s goal. It looks at whether the items on a research questionnaire or survey accurately reflect what is being measured in a particular context (Kerlinger & Lee, 2000). To assess for face validity in a published study, one should consider whether there is an adequate number of questions included in the instrument to measure all intended aspects; whether specific terms used are clear and easily understood by participants; if ambiguous wording has been avoided; and if best practices have been followed when crafting responses such as multiple-choice, Likert scales, etc. (Gray & Schoon, 2019). In addition, researchers must also examine any instructions given to participants as part of their assessment for valid results (Cooper & Schindler, 2014).
When it comes to assessing face validity in a published research study, it is important to evaluate the relevance between what was asked and how those questions can be applied by both participants and researchers. If an instrument does not seem focused enough on measuring what was supposed to be analyzed or lacks clarity then this could potentially lead to biased results or data that cannot be accurately interpreted (Loopstra et al., 2017). The researcher should take into account any potential cultural differences when designing an instrument since these differences may affect how people understand certain words or phrases used within surveys or questionnaires. Additionally, researchers need to make sure that they have provided their participants with enough information about why they are conducting this study so that everyone involved understands its purpose. Finally, authors need to construct appropriate statistical tools for analyzing collected data from different instruments which would help them better understand their results.
In conclusion, face validity is an essential component when it comes evaluating any type of research instrument because it allows researchers gauge whether their chosen methods will adequately measure whatever phenomena they intend on studying. A well-crafted survey with relevant and clearly worded questions will help ensure accurate results while making sure all parties involved have proper understanding before initiating data collection processes.
References:
Cooper D R., & Schindler P S. (2014). Business Research Methods 12th edn [Kindle]. McGraw Hill Education.. Retrieved from https://read Without Registering PDF Cooper D R., & Schindler P S.’s Business Research Methods 12th edn Online ebook
Gray J B., & Schoon I V.(2019) “The Principles Of Measurement Instrument Validity And Reliability” Journal Of Economic Surveys 33(2): 422–455 doi: 10/1111/joes12010
Kerlinger F N., & Lee H B.(2000) Foundations Of Behavioral Research 4th edn USA: Harcourt College Publishers