Sample Solution

The Human Condition: Environmental Pollution
Environmental pollution is a human condition that has significant implications for the health of humans and other living beings on earth. It is considered to be a social problem because it affects all aspects of life, including human well-being, economic growth, and natural resources. It also has wide-reaching consequences on our environment which can result in long-term damage to both ecosystems and the planet itself.

Characteristics That Qualify it as a Social Problem
Environmental pollution poses serious threats to humanity and its surroundings due to certain characteristics that make it difficult for individuals or even governments alone to solve this issue. Firstly, environmental pollution is caused by an array of sources; from industrial emissions released into the air or wastewater discharged into rivers and lakes, most pollutants originate from man-made activities (Laux et al., 2009). This means that any attempts made by those responsible are not enough since the amount and diversity of pollutants generated by multiple sources often surpasses what any single group can tackle effectively (OECD/UNEP 2018). Additionally, environmental pollution is driven by globalization; with more countries becoming deeply interconnected through trade liberalization across international borders there arises an increased production rate creating more waste than ever before (Gudasz et al., 2015). Finally, environmental pollution causes irreparable damages if left unchecked due to its hazardous impacts on human health such as respiratory diseases or even mortality rates (Marnay et al., 2014). Therefore these three characteristics clearly demonstrate why environmental pollution must be addressed at a larger scale in order to have any chance of effective mitigation efforts being successful in the future.

Describing The Social Problem Via The Lenses Of Sociological Theories: Structural Functionalism Theory & Conflict Theory
Structural functionalism theory suggests that society is composed of interrelated parts with each part having particular functions which contribute towards collective stability as well as provide identity for individuals within them (Haralambos & Holborn 2008 ). In terms of environmental pollution structural functionalists would argue that this problem stems from misallocation between certain societal roles; specifically how certain forms of production cause problems yet these actors remain unaccountable for their actions leading up to such unfortunate circumstances( Gudasz et al., 2015). For instance one could look at how some developing countries lack sufficient regulatory systems allowing large corporations freedom over their emission practices putting communities closeby at risk but with no repercussions whatsoever(Lauxetal.,2009) . Similarly conflict theorists believe society consists primarily out unequal power struggles based upon class divisions amongst citizens( Haralambos & Holborn 2008); therefore when looking at environmental degradation they claim it’s important recognize who suffers most from this phenomena since different groups may find themselves vulnerable while others remain unaffected.( Marnay et al., 2014)For example indigenous populations in Latin America have been exposed extensively toxic chemicals used by surrounding industries without ever having received consent nor compensation( OECD/UNEP 2018 ).

Working Concepts Specific To Each Theory :

Structural Functionalism: Interdependence : This concept emphasizes how societal units interact forming an integrated whole where functioning relies heavily upon cooperation between members , making sure everyone does their job so harmony remains unharmed.( Haralambos & Holborn2008 ) Furthermore interdependence also implies balance needs exist between duties assigned different parts ; meaning if one fails then rest will suffer too ultimately leading collapse entire system.( Durkheim 1997 )

Conflict Theory : Domination : According this theory domination serves purpose maintaining status quo via use authority whereby powerful control weaker giving access privileges others don’t possess instead using coercion force keep things unchanged.( Marx 1887 ) For example when analyzing causes behind various environmental issues like climate change then we see rich nations dominate poorer ones refusing take steps prevent further damage under pretext protecting their own interests rather addressing issue proper manner .

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 WhatsApp Us Now