Explain your thought process; it is just as important was whether you get the “right” answer in these! (Sometimes in law answers are not so black and white.) No Sources are needed however please feel free to use them if you find it necessary. 1. Two suspects are placed in the back of a patrol car. Both have already invoked their right to an attorney. Thinking they are alone, they begin to talk about the crime. Little do they know, the patrol car is outfitted with a hidden camera. They make incriminating statements. The district attorney wants to introduce the videotape as evidence against the suspects. Can she use the videotape? Why or why not? 2. Sheriff Chandler is driving down the street. He stops at a house when he notices black smoke coming out of the kitchen window. He knocks on the door, waits 30 seconds, then breaks it down. He doesn’t have a warrant. In the kitchen, he finds a pan of brownies burning in the stove. He also sees a crack pipe and a rock of crack cocaine on the counter. The tenant is in the bathroom showering. Can the crack cocaine be used against the tenant? 3. Mr. West is crossing from Canada into the United States. His car is in good working order, it doesn’t smell like drugs, and there are no warrants out for Mr. West. Still, Customs Agent North asks Mr. West to pull over so they can go through his car. In the trunk, they find bootleg DVDs labeled fo​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​r sale. They want to use the counterfeit merchandise to charge Mr. West. Can they use it? 4. Police are called to a home where there is a suspected drug use. One roommate answers the door. The other roommate is in the kitchen. Through the open door, the police are able to see a large baggie of marijuana on the coffee table. They want to use it to charge the roommates. Can they? 5. Police are called to Mr. John’s apartment on a domestic disturbance call. Ms. Jane, his girlfriend, opens the door. The police ask Ms. Jane if she lives there. She lies and says yes. They then ask if she minds if they look around. She says, “No, go ahead!” knowing full well the police will find Mr. John’s illegal handgun sitting out. Mr. John is arrested. He moves to have the evidence suppressed since it was his apartment and he didn’t consent. Will Mr. John be successful in keeping the evidence out in court? 6. Mr. F is arrested on the charge of murdering a young girl. He invokes his right to an attorney. When they are transporting him to the country jail, the officers try to guilt him. They say things like, “It’s the holidays; it sure would be nice for the family to know what happened to their daughter,” and “She was so young and innocent; she at least deserves a good Christian burial.” Mr. F breaks down and tells them to pull off the road. He takes them into the woods and shows them where the body is. It is notably close to where volunteers are busy combing the woods looking for her. Will this e​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​vidence be allowed in court?